Saturday, February 25, 2023

1989 Chevrolet Corvette and Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z - A Tale of Two Chevy's

 

On the clear coat surface, that the 1989 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z on the left has an asking price some twenty-two-thousand dollars more than the 1989 Chevrolet Corvette on the right is a mind-bender. More like a fender-bender, actually. Both are in similarly stellar condition although, honestly, the IROC is in better shape overall. Lower mileage too, just twenty-four thousand or so on its thirty-four-year-old analog ticker compared to some forty-three thousand on the Corvette. That enough to warrant the  $33,000 asking price for the IROC compared to the relatively scant $12,000 for the Corvette? Oh, hell no. Well, not in my book anyway. 


I'd be hard pressed to find anyone, an automobile enthusiast or not, who'd find the IROC superior to the Corvette. The Corvette is more comfortable, has a better ride, handles better, accelerates faster and has a higher top speed. In general, it's tons more fun to drive. I didn't mention anything about appearances either. 


Subjectively, through my foggy goggles, any fourth-generation Corvette in convertible guise is vastly more handsome than any Camaro too, even a top-dog IROC-Z. If the Corvette wasn't a convertible, I'd say they were dead-even in styling; both double battered and deep-fried in 1980's day-glow, fastback\hatchback cheese. If the Corvette was a coupe, tip of the chin spoiler would go to the IROC-Z but not enough to out weigh the superior driving dynamics of the plastic-fantastic. 


But the proof is in the actual numbers - third generation Camaro Z28's and IROC's are worth more and, in many cases significantly more than C4 Corvettes. This IROC here doesn't even have an L98 engine; it's has the 5.0-liter, LB9, Tuned-Port-Injection engine. Again, my opinion, this is akin to sacrilege. How in the name of Madonna, Wham! and Michael Jackson is this remotely possible?  


Well, it's not unusual for cars that were less expensive when new to appreciate more than more expensive ones. For example, a 1970 Cadillac Coupe deVille convertible in good condition has an average retail value of $16,500 and a Chevelle SS in just "fair" shape is worth around $55,000. Chevelles in "concours" or pristine condition, especially if they're original and unrestored, can go for well north of a hundred-grand, you'd be hard pressed to fine a museum quality Cadillac worth $50,000. Meanwhile, the typical Chevelle SS probably went out the door when new for under five-thousand and the Cadillac for more than sixty-five-hundred. 


Meanwhile, our '89 IROC here stickered for a tad under $25,000 and the Corvette for around $40,000; that's roughly the same cost differential between the 1970 Cadillac and Chevelle. In any event, again, what in the name of leg warmers is going on here? 


Much in the same way the '70 Chevelle shreds the '70 at the 2023 box office, it's the market that drives these values regardless of what your opinion of the vehicles is. The bottom line is "Gen-X", or those born between 1965 and 1981, value third-generation Camaros more than they do fourth-gen or "C4" Corvettes. Don't take my word for it, either. According to Haggerty Insurance, Gen-X'ers make up thirty-two percent of Haggerty's customers, and they have more than half of the third generation Camaros they insure. Meanwhile, more than half of the C4's they insure belong to "Boomers" or those born between 1946 and 1964.  


Makes sense, on paper, especially if we look at this technically if not clinically. The Camaro IROC-Z was the aspirational car of Gen X they could, at least in theory, afford. And back-in-the-day. many a "kid" drove one plowing every penny they made into paying for them, the gas they inhaled and insuring them. Unless they were lucky enough to have parents who footed the bill. Never discount how powerful a part nostalgia plays in this as well. Meanwhile fourth-gen Corvettes were not only way more expensive, they were driven by older folks as well. 


In the end, while I find third-generation Camaros, especially IROC-Z', flinty, crude and cheap, not that C4's are by any means bastions of refinement, I'm fixing to get me the performance buy of a lifetime, one of these days when I trade up to a C4 convertible. For my money, it's a whole lot more car than an IROC for not much money. 

Monday, February 20, 2023

2002 Dale Earnhardt Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS - Fuel Pump Failure

Aside from the handful of times I've run out of gas, in all my years of driving, I have never had a car simply conk out on me. That was until this past Friday afternoon on a routine if not mundane trip to Walmart for cat food, when my 2002 Dale Earnhardt Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS decided to give up the ghost. 

No check engine light on, no noise from under the hood or a loss of power prior. Nope. Just a simultaneous brief kick-up of the tach-o-meter, a momentary herky-jerky surge and then.... oblivion. Good thing I was doing forty-miles-per-hour or so to give me enough momentum to coast into the parking lot of the Longhorn Steak House up the street from the Walmart. If it wasn't so cold out, I would have stopped in for some Firecracker Chicken Wings with Avocado Lime Sauce before calling AAA for a tow. 

I knew the engine hadn't seized because the starter was able to crank it freely and there was no tell-tale "knocking rod" noise or any ominous sounds or smoke ahead of it stalling out. There was plenty of heat too, always a good thing. The only thing that's been giving me trouble had been the fuel pump; when warm and then shut off, it needed up to four tries to stay running.  I had mentioned the problem to my mechanic recently and he said it sounded like the fuel pump was having trouble maintaining pressure when it was warm. The multiple start thing manageable as long as the engine finally lit for good. And it always did. Of course, I didn't expect it to just go kaput like it did. On a google search of symptoms of a bad fuel pump, "sudden death" wasn't on the list. All that said, all things pointed to the fuel pump. 

It could have been so much worse. This past week I had to make two, two-hundred-plus mile traipses to the office, and I shudder to think what it would have been like had this happened on the Ohio Turnpike. In the not too recent past as well, my wife and I used "The Dale" on trips to New York City, Long Island and Washington D.C. from our home here outside Cleveland, Ohio. There was second guessing our decision, my wife's mostly, to take a car with more than a quarter-million-miles on it on such long trips, but there was nary a problem, not that there was any hint of an issue in the moments on Friday before my car stalled out. 

That this breakdown happened four miles from my home was again, truly a blessing. Had it happened halfway between my home and my office, I might have been forced to have it towed to a mechanic who would have salivated at an easy thousand-dollar repair I would have had no choice but to pay. Worse yet, what if the pump had gone out when we were in New York or D.C.? Same thing, of course, plus I'd have to be concerned about extending the trip as we waited for my car to have work done, work I could easily do. And save hundreds and hundreds of dollars doing it myself.  

Swapping the pump was straight forward. I put the pump in that failed several years and more than 150,000 miles ago when the gas gauge started going wonky. Luckily, there's an access panel behind the fold-down rear seat that gave me access to it; all cars with fuel pumps in gas tanks should have such access. I've replaced fuel pumps where I had to drop the tank to get at it and that's no fun, especially on  pumps where the fuel lines on the pump are metal. Take off those eight, ten-millimeters, disconnect the fuel lines and electrical connectors, pop the retaining ring, rinse and repeat. The only issue I had was some gunk got into the gas tank when I was pulling the old pump out. Quick suck on my wet-dry vac and I was good to go to.  

Now, granted, there was every possibility that what made my car stop running might not have been the fuel pump - and that was in the back of my mind the whole time. With no check engine light on, "no-starts" like this can be hard to decipher. You go with what you think it might be and hope for the best. After I installed the new pump, I silently prayed to St. Christopher for engine to turn over and...it did. Whew. The Dale lives on. 

I'm planning a big road trip for my birthday at the end of March to Nashville, Chattanooga, Washington D.C. and Brooklyn, New York. If I do it all, I'm looking at more than two-thousand miles. Prior to this past Friday, I wouldn't think twice about taking The Dale on such a long trip, but sudden break downs do tend to make you think twice about things you used to take for granted. Who knows what I'll do. More than likely, I'll roll the dice and take my good old boy. He's only let me down this one time and I think he deserves another chance to be taken for granted. 




Sunday, February 19, 2023

1961 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special - Three Generations


In the not too recent past, Facebook Marketplace was a haven for old and often times unique automobiles. Granted, a lot of it was pure trash, but I could count on a gaggle of at least somewhat interesting and affordable old stuff to whittle away time with. All that changed sometime during The Pandemic as "Marketplace" became just another site for people looking for anonymous, slate-grey Nissan Rogues or similarly generic vehicles. Dealership sites found it too and now clutter it with ads like they do on Craigslist. Sigh. That's why when this 1961 Cadillac Fleetwood 60 Special with a transplanted, twin-turbo, Ford V-10 truck engine popped up the other day on Marketplace, I most certainly wasn't looking for it, it felt like a throwback to those pre-Pandemic days when I could count on finding "special" cars on it. 


This Frankenstein-ian monster is the work of Bob Richards of Fremont, Ohio, his eight-year-old-son and Bob's father and is the most fascinating project car I've come across since I found a 1981 Chevrolet Citation X-11 on Craigslist stuffed with a 4.9-liter, Cadillac V-8 engine. Bob, who's a lifelong "Ford guy", has been working on cars his entire life so he knows a thing or two about engine swaps and fabrication. 


It had been sitting in a garage in Columbus since 1974 and was bought as a project by a gentleman who lost interest in it. Enter Bob who bought it from him and while he got it running, thought better of rebuilding its 390-cubic inch V-8 or even doing a proverbial "LS swap". As Bob put it, "that wasn't crazy enough". Bill Mitchell, the GM design honcho who penned this car, is spinning in his grave. Oh, the humanity.


Cadillac's were all new for 1961 with much smaller tailfins than 1960 models and the Fleetwood Sixty Special was top-of-the-line. Well, technically, the Fleetwood Seventy-Five was, but that was a limousine; not that many a Sixty Special wasn't chauffer driven. The big difference between a Sixty Special and a Sedan deVille was the "Special" had a formal, limousine-like roof line and different rear-back light (or windshield). It also came standard with every gadget and gizmo Cadillac could come up with. They had to somehow substantiate the thousand-dollar tariff they charged for it over a Sedan deVille or a Series 62; thousand bucks was big money back then in the gilded Camelot age. 


Ford's "modular", single-overhead-cam V-10 was the result of Ford moving away from pushrod, overhead valve V-8's in the '90's to overhead-cam engines. Ford's "modular", SOHC V-8 topped out at 5.4-liters and the horsepower and torque it made was not adequate for some Ford customers who had come to rely on the raw power of their 7.5-liter, or 460-cubic inch, V-8. In particular buyers who used their vehicles commercially. With the 5.4 pushing the limits on how much it could displace, the cylinders were all but siamese, rather than develop a proprietary, large displacement truck V-8, Ford grafted two additional cylinders onto the 5.4 V-8. Voila, a legend was born.  


Leave it to Bob to marry the two. 


Bob had challenges at first getting the Garret turbos to play nice with the Ford V-10's PCM as there's not much tuning information out there for the engine; Ford never offered a turbocharged version. If he wasn't selling this, he'd swap the factory-Ford PCM for a (pricey) Holley Dominator and replace the rear-end with a nine-inch Ford unit. No doubt the Dominator box would help with tuning and diagnostics and the stout Ford rear end would be better able to handle what Bob claims is some five-hundred-pound feet of torque. 


The transmission was the (relative) easy part. That's a Tremec T45 out of a 2003 Ford Mustang and with an eight-bolt Cobra flywheel and an eleven inch clutch it bolted right up. Makes sense given the Ford V-10, again, is derived from the Ford V-8. Fun fact, before the Chevrolet Cavalier-based Cadillac Cimmaron of 1982 infamy, Cadillac hadn't offered a manual since 1953 and that was on their limousines and ambulances. Cadillac made an automatic standard in 1949 although a manual was still available through 1952. 


Bob also converted the front drums to discs and added an air suspension. More fun facts, and amazingly so, GM didn't start using front disc brakes until 1965 and that was on the Chevrolet Corvette, Cadillac didn't have them available even until 1967; they became standard in 1969. Wow. Nothing like that bowel cleansing feeling of, "is this thing going to stop??" when driving an old GM drum brake car. I need to find out more about this magnificent shifter lever on the T45. 

 

This goth, grand-old dame is most certainly not everyone's cup-of-antifreeze but as they say in the business, there's an arse for every seat. The ask is $9,000 and that seems fair given what's in it and the amount of time Bob, his son and his father spent building it. Bob's very proud that three generations of his family had a hand in putting this together, as he should be. If you're interested comment below and I'll hook you up. Perhaps I'll meet you out in Fremont and we'll go for a spin. A very, very fast spin. 


Friday, February 10, 2023

1977 Pontiac Can Am - I Know. As If


Here's something you don't see everyday and you didn't see that many of them in the late Seventies either. It's not a Pontiac Grand Am, Grand Prix or Lemans, although it shares a lot of DNA with those cars, but a 1977 Pontiac Can Am. Excuse me, a what?


A one-year-only, 1977 Pontiac Can Am. Technically a 1977 1/2 Cam Am while we're at it and it's supposedly a mashup of the then current Pontiac Grand Prix and Trans Am; although it's based on a LeMans Sport Coupe. If you're of my certain, ahem, vintage, and you appreciate automobiles from your woe-be-gotten wonder years, you may have a proclivity to go bonkers over these things. I know I have, on occasion, done so. It's no "Smokey and The Bandit Trans Am" but us beggars born in the hey-day of the muscle car era, meaning by the time we came of driving age they were all but dead and buried, can't be choosers. 


Pontiac introduced these cars halfway through the 1977 model-year as either a re-imagining of the Pontiac GTO or a literal big send off to their intermediate sized coupes that were about to be hacked into upsized compacts. Legend has it Detroit ad man Jim Wangers, many give credit to Mr. Wangers for marketing the original GTO when he was Pontiac's public relations director, who approached Pontiac management with the idea of a Pontiac LeMans dressed up akin to a Carnival Red or orange, 1969 GTO Judge. The original inspiration was a 1975 Pontiac Grand Am decorated in a Bicentennial motif; that car never saw production. Can't blame Wangers as he was part of the team that came up with the GTO Judge in the first place.  Perhaps he saw the downsized, 1978 Pontiac mid-size models and thought these outgoing cars needed to go out guns blazing. 


Pontiac "suits" were not amused. When Wangers came back with a LeMans in Cameo white like the Grand Am Bicentennial car, tri-color stripes, body-colored rims and the shaker hood from the Trans Am, somewhat amazingly considering the era, they greenlighted the production of 5,000 Can Am's. 


The car was named after the Canadian American Cup Series races and were "special builds". They had the sportier looking dash from the then-current Grand Prix and the 220-horsepower, 6.6-liter (400-cubic inch) Trans Am engine; California and high-altitude areas got the 185-horse, Oldsmobile "403". They were shipped to Wangers' "Motortown" facility where they cut a hole in the hood, fitted the engine with the Trans Am's "Shaker" hood, applied the decals and installed the all-important fiberglass rear spoiler. The machine that made the spoilers broke after 1,377 were made and production ground to halt.  Apparently, you can't have no Cam Am with no rear spoiler. 


I have my doubts this a "real" Can Am, though. The exterior stripes are missing, good luck finding those, and that's a steering wheel from a Grand Prix and not the one found on other Can Am's. I doubt that's a dashboard for a Grand Prix as well. As far as the engine goes, Pontiac's non-Trans Am 400-cubic inch V-8 was available for 1977 on the LeMans as well. So was their far less powerful "350" and (new-for'77) 301 engines. But who knows. Jim Wangers has said there are a number of "Can Am clones" out there too. 


Why anyone would go through the trouble of cloning a 1977 1/2 Pontiac Can Am is anyone's guess. The lack of the stripes is disheartening, though. Especially on something with a Facebook Marketplace ask of $13,000. I know. As if. Take it from me, when you own a car this old that's had multiple owners, you're not only dealing with what you want to do it or have done, but what its myriad other owners have done to it too. I you're interested comment below. I'd triple check the build codes and VIN number. 

Thursday, February 9, 2023

1973 Chrysler Town and Country - Skeumorphic


Few things throw me back to my woe-be-gone wonder years like a station wagon with fake wood on the sides. When I was a kid, vinyl laminated barges like this 1973 Chrysler Town and Country were as ubiquitous as men with longer hair than women, bell bottoms and disco music. As they say, everything old is new again, but we'll never see cars (never mind SUV's) this big and heavy again and certainly, well, hopefully, we'll never see ones festooned with simulated wood grain decals on their flanks. 


The use of this simulated wood applique, as if this stuff is simulated needs to be pointed out, stems from the storied wood stations wagons of yore that were known as "woodies". As manufacturers moved to all-steel bodies, the look of woodies literally stuck around with domestic manufacturers use of simulated wood grain decals. Toyota offered a Cresida woodie wagon in the early 1980's that was a U.S.-exclusive; lucky us. Funny how certain things don't age well. Even if the fake bark on our '73 here was in showroom condition, my twenty-something sons would still hold their noses. If you're of my certain, ahem, vintage, big old wagons like this are pure nostalgia trips. In more ways than one and not always good ones. Are we there yet?  


While General Motors doesn't get credit for inventing the station wagon or "woodies", we give them credit for the first use of vinyl to simulate or emulate the look of a woodie-wagon. They first used a narrow strip of it to decorate their new-for-1949, all-steel body Chevrolet, Pontiac and Oldsmobile station wagons. Incidentally, the term for this sort of thing is, "skeumorphism", that means, "a derivative object using original design cues"; if ever there was a five-dollar word, that's it. Perhaps it's a ten-dollar word with inflation and all. For whatever reason, I have my theories, the tailgates on these things were made from wood. I would assume because they could charge more for these wagons as they were some of GM's most expensive models back then. Certainly, makes no sense from a practical standpoint. 


Speaking of being impractical, curiously, Buick continued to use wood in the construction of their wagons during this time and did so through 1953; that's the real deal on this '53 Roadmaster Estate. In fact, Buick was the last domestic manufacturer to use wood structurally on any vehicle. The British car maker Morgan used wood up through 1971. If you don't count hearses and ambulances, Cadillac never got a station wagon. Either a steel-bodied one or skeumorphic one.   


If we want to split-hairs, though, the first use of a vinyl decals to emulate the look of a woodie was Chrysler's use of it on their late 1947 through 1950 Chrysler Town and Country two-door convertible and four-door sedan; the sedan was dropped after 1948. Above is a 1948 four-door. These were, then the first skeumorphic woodies. At least the wood-framing is actual white-ash, but it was all for show. It wasn't structural as it was on Chrysler's 1941 and 1942 wood-bodied Town and Country wagon. 


Here's one of those in all its wooden glory although it does have a steel roof, most if not all earlier woodies had wooden slat-roofs covered with heavy canvas. Based on the then current Chrysler Windsor Town Sedan, this car's steel top greatly improved driving and ride dynamics. Probably because they sold so few, they were expensive and station wagons weren't mainstream yet, Chrysler discontinued these wagons after The War. 


For the record, Star, a long gone brand of Durant Motors, built the first factory station wagon in 1923. Prior to that, anything construed as a station wagon were built by custom builders who often times employed moonlighting wood cabinet makers. 


By far and away, much of the credit for the woodie-station wagon goes to the Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford and his team noted the popularity of custom built, wooden delivery hacks and station wagons, many of which were built on Ford Model T chassis and running gear, and they introduced their own in 1929 based on a long-wheelbase version of the 1927 Model A. 


Ford refined these wagons over the years adding fixed but removable windows in 1933 and front doors with retractable windows in 1935 (above). Rear windows that rolled up and down didn't arrive until 1946. Blame World War II for that delay as well as these vehicles, again, were hardly family conveyances so there was no inherent rush to make them more car like. Through the end of their production run in 1948, all Ford-woodies had the slatted wood roofs with a canvas top. Quite the jalopies. Albeit handsome ones. 


GM didn't get in the station wagon game until 1940, above is a '40 Chevrolet "Special Deluxe" and was very similar in construction to the Ford wagons. Prior to that, if you wanted "That GM Feeling", an independent coach builder could build you one. Out of wood, of course. 


While wooden station wagons were expensive and somewhat impractical for daily, non-commercial use, they creaked, moaned, groaned and cracked and needed semi-annual varnishing, the look was seen as a status symbol. When Ford introduced their first post-war station wagon in 1949, they kept the "woodie-look" by adhering wood panels to their new all-steel body (above). These required the same maintenace as "real-woodies", thus we can understand why manufacturers switched to synthetic wood. 


Mid-model year 1952 and through 1954, Ford used fiberglass panels to create "the look" although, even from this distance, we see something gone awry with the skeumorphism. Note on this '54, the fakeness stretches all the way onto the front fenders. It's a look that would prevail for the rest of the simulated fake wood era. On this car the pillars are painted steel. 


Ford gets additional credit for spurring the use of a simulated wood grain vinyl decals starting in 1955 on their Country Squire. Through 1991, Ford used the non-wood wood on a number of different sized wagons from their compact Falcon "Squire" to their mid-size Fairlane Squire and later Torino wagons. They also used it on their coupe as well as Pinto wagon, Granada wagon, Gran Torino and LTD II wagons, Fairmont and Escort wagons and mid-sized 1983-1985 LTD wagon. Mercury, also a division of Ford, got a number of simulated grain wagons starting in 1957 through 1991. 


Through 1966, the only other manufacturer to offer simulated woodgrain on a station wagon was, interestingly enough, American Motors. Above is a 1956 Rambler "Cross Country". AMC offered vinyl wood on a number of different vehicles through their merger with Chrysler, or demise, in 1987. 


Chrysler's Plymouth division built a station wagon similar to wood bodied Ford wagons from 1939 through 1948; you're not alone thinking this a Ford or Chevrolet. Curiously, they used a semi-wooden body on their 1950 "Special Deluxe" station wagon; they introduced an all-steel wagon in 1949 as well, which, no surprise with its lower cost of admission, sold significantly better. With few takers, the "hybrid" Special Deluxe was discontinued in 1951. Dodge (and DeSoto) didn't offer a car-based station wagon until 1949 and that was all-steel as well. For 1950 Dodge and DeSoto offered a "woodie-wagon" but was an all but rebadged semi-wooden bodied, Plymouth Special Deluxe. 


When Chrysler updated their all-steel wagon for 1951, all the woodies, whether skeumorphic or not, were gone. Above is a handsome but less than distinctive looking (than a 1941-42) 1951 Chrysler Town and Country. 


Chrysler didn't start gluing the vinyl laminate to their wagons until they offered it on their new-for-1966 Town and Country. Plymouth got a (fake) woodie in 1966 as well, Dodge in 1967. DeSoto had gone the way of the dodo during the 1961 MY. Chrysler offered the skeumorphic trim on a number of different wagon-based cars through 1988. Up to and including the K-car based "woodies" of 1982-1988 fame. Or infamy. 


Never to be out-done, General Motors started offering the stuff in 1966 across wagons on all their lines (except Cadillac) including their top-of-the-line Caprice station wagon. And, seemingly just like that, a craze was born overnight although its coming was decades in the making. GM offered the wood decals on a number of different vehicles for the next thirty-years. 


Cars with fake wood on the sides are mostly remembered for being on stations wagons but The Big Three (and a half) stuck it on a bunch of different things. Like this 1968 Mercury Parklane. These giant decals were marketed as "Yacht Paneling" making it figuratively if not literally a land yacht.  


This 1968-1969 Chrysler Newport with "Sportsgrain" was a companion model to the Chrysler Town and Country station wagon. Fun fact, it was Chrysler's first (and only) non-wagon-woodie since 1950. No one cared. 


Ford and GM gussied up their car\pick trucks in the 1970's with the fake wood too. GM taking the literal tackiness one step further offering a vinyl top on their 1973-1976 El Camino. By the way, in most states, El Camino's and Ranchero's are classified as trucks. Good luck getting those bikes out, kids. 


From 1976 to 1980 the Mercury version of this Ford Pinto. the "Bobcat Villager", could be had with the same motif as this Pinto (love the mags). Note the surfboards. In the 1950's and 1960', "woodies" were popular with surfers because of they could easily haul their wares and a gaggle of passengers. They were cheap too since many had fallen into disrepair because of the required maintenance. The Beach Boys make reference to loading up a "woodie" in their 1962 song, "Surfin' Safari". 


This 1976 Chevette woodie simultaneously makes no sense and all the sense in the world. I guess you had to be there. 


Add some flames and this woodie-AMC Pacer would be the ultimate Mirthmobile. Ok, it's technically a wagon. Party on.


Even Volkswagen got into the game although I'm not sure what they were thinking with their "woodie-Rabbit" (woodie-wabbit?) of 1977 through 1979. Can't blame VW's marketing department for trying something different. Then again, we can. 



Even General Motors' mighty 1970-1977 Chevrolet Suburban (left) and 1973-1980 Chevrolet Blazer\GM Jimmy weren't immune from the ignominy of skeumorphic wood. Somehow, on the Blazer\Jimmy, it actually works. I think. 


1978-1980 Dodge Omni\Plymouth Horizon with the "Premium Woodgrain" package is another eye-sore example. I guess this car was too small to market the laminate as "Yacht Paneling". 



Then we have the K-car LeBaron "woodies" in 1982-1988 (there was a wagon too). Little did I know at the time they were emulating the Chrysler Town and Country woodie convertibles of the late 1940's. Was the K-car woodie then double-skeumorphic? 


Lastly, for now at least, there's more, lots more, even the vehicle that most say did-in the station wagon couldn't escape the glue on. Although, on Chrysler's game changing 1984 minivan, the trim., much like on the K-car LeBaron, it's a skeumorphism of a skeumorphism, it's nothing but a fashion statement but what kind of statement were they trying to make? 


The Griswold's "Wagon Queen Family Truckster" hilariously harpooned not only vehicles with fake wood but the entire station wagon market segment. Just as well as by 1983 when National Lampoon's "Vacation" premiered, station wagons were long deemed out of step and behind the times. No wonder that boomers eschewed wagons for mini-vans although, one could argue that mini-vans were even more mom- and dad-ish than station wagons were. When the SUV gauntlet kicked in roughly a decade later, station wagon sales really imploded. 


Ford's last "woodie" was their 1991 Country Squire and Mercury Colony Park. Above right is a '91 Country Squire. GM soldiered on with their fleet of woodies through 1996. Above, right, is a 1996 Buick Roadmaster Estate. 


Chrysler, bless their hearts, had a "woodie" PT Cruiser in 2002 and 2004. Mercifully, no other vehicle manufacturer has thought to do a woodie since. 


Which brings us around to our 1973 Chrysler Town and Country. This beast popped up on Facebook Marketplace and while I'm no fan of Chrysler fuselage models, its fake wood inspired me to do more than a diatribe about Chrysler's dubious 1969-1973 full-size cars. 


Alas, this car doesn't have rear-facing (good lord!) jump seats, which were the end-all and be-all of my generation when we could fit in them. Ones that did, thankfully, came with seat belts although moms and dads had little luck getting us kiddos to wear them. Shoot, they wouldn't wear them either. 


Here's our '73 from a Chrysler sales brochure in all its blocky, brand-new fuselage and simulated wood glory. Not quite sure what the dude with the falcon plans to do with the big bird once he's done doing whatever it is he's doing with it. There's no cage for the thing in the car although the car is big enough for flock of them. 


The Facebook Marketplace ad for this has a $4,500 asking price. Not unreasonable considering what appears to be its overall solid condition. Ironically, about the only "need-to" would be replacing its simulated wood grain decals. You could certainly peel it off and simply repaint the car, but then it wouldn't be a 1973 Chrysler Town and Country. 

If there's anything inaccurate about this blog please let me know. I spent over a month on this project and want to make sure everything is accurate. Happy trails. Thanks!