Saturday, August 22, 2026

That Time I Broke Down on I-80, 70-miles from Home

A bang followed by a muffled under-hood scream and a temperature gauge that suddenly spiked told me everything I needed to know: get off the Ohio Turnpike. Now.

I was just a half-mile east of Exit 209, around mile marker 210.1, and with the temperature gauge pinned in the red, running the engine for even another minute could make a bad problem much, much worse. I pulled onto the very narrow shoulder on the right side of the road, which happened to be part of a bridge, and shut it off. I reached for my Triple-A card as the bridge see-sawed up and down and my car was buffeted back and forth by passing traffic.

"Are you in a safe place?" the dispatcher asked.

"Ummm, no. Not really. Actually, it's quite dangerous," I said.

"Oh, sorry to hear that," she said. "Year, make and model of your vehicle?"

Somewhat put off by her apparent indifference to my precarious situation—but realizing it was probably just part of her script, and there wasn't much she could do about my location anyway—I responded:

"2009 Toyota RAV4. Green."

A couple of minutes of the worst on-hold music of all time later, she came back on.

"Okay. You're all set, Mr. Connolly. Thank you for being a Triple-A member for 45 years. A tow truck will be there to assist you by 7:40 p.m."

It was only just past 6:00 p.m.

Good grief.

It was then that one of those ODOT—Ohio Department of Transportation—vehicles with the big flashing arrow on top appeared in my rearview mirror.

"Yes!" I thought to myself. "The traffic gods are converging! I'm saved! They'll not only get me to safety, they'll fix my car for me, too, in the blink of an eye."

If only that were true.

The person in the truck raised the big arrow, alerting passing motorists to the hazard that was me and my ancient RAV and suggesting they move to the left.

Many did not.

You don't think much about the faceless, non-playable characters—NPCs—you see stranded on the side of the road with their hoods up. At best, you're like, "Geez, sucks to be them," as you whiz on by.

You look at it differently, of course, when it's your ass in the barrel going over the falls.

Part of me was thinking, "I can't believe no one is stopping just to check in and offer me a bottle of water."

The ODOT employee sat in the truck for nearly 15 minutes. Then I saw the door open and out she came, motioning for me to stay in my sweatbox of a car. She made her way over to the front passenger-side window, which I had already lowered.

Through the deafening roar of traffic, she asked what was going on. I told her I thought I'd lost my water-pump pulley, and she took my phone number and said someone from Johnny's Auto & Truck Towing would be calling.

When I told her I had already called Triple-A, she told me Triple-A doesn't service the Turnpike; the Turnpike's designated towing operators do. Sure enough, no sooner had she said that than Triple-A called me back and told me the same thing.

"Call pound-677," they said.

The ODOT lady, whom I later learned was named Loretta, said not to bother because she had already contacted the tow company. She then went back to her massive truck.

Probably a liability to have people in my position wandering around up there with them.

I decided to get out of my car and wait behind the guardrail. Better to get a late-afternoon sunburn than be pancaked by some yahoo who didn't see Loretta's arrow.

Once over the guardrail, I discovered there was literally nowhere to go. I had maybe a foot and a half of gravel before a sharp incline down to the nameless, lonely road the bridge passed over; actually, it was Ravenna-Warren Road. A tall metal fence blocked access to the road, presumably to prevent people from walking up to the roadway to play license-plate bingo.

Chris from the towing company showed up around 7:00, a good 40 minutes ahead of the time Triple-A had given me.

A short, gruff-looking guy who was maybe 45 years old, he didn't give me a chance to put the RAV in neutral before he dragged it up onto his flatbed, leaving tire skids on the road and on his bed.

"That won't give me flat spots on my tires, will it?"

He stared at me blankly, then motioned for me to get into his truck.

As a Triple-A Platinum member, I was eligible for a tow of the 70-plus miles back home. That also meant an hour-plus ride in a bouncy Ram 5500 with someone who, much like sitting next to someone you don't know on an airplane, you'd just as soon not speak to.

I knew I'd have to fight my instincts and impulses and not be chatty. He appeared to be someone who'd rather not make small talk.

I spent the first 10 minutes or so wafting in the cool, cigarette-smoke-drenched, air-conditioned air of his truck's cabin, texting my wife and checking email before realizing I was down to about 10 percent battery. He had his phone plugged into what I could tell was the only charging port on the dash.

Knowing I didn't want to come across like the Uber driver or passenger who insists on conversation, I started out by lobbing softballs.

"This thing gas or diesel?" I asked.

He stared straight ahead, his right hand at five o'clock on the steering wheel and his left hand clutching his phone.

He then muttered, in the rather unusual Midwest-meets-Deep-South kind of way some native Ohioans talk:

"Day-zul."

"Must be a Cummins turbo-diesel," I said excitedly, although doing my best not to sound like a car geek—a car geek with a dead Toyota RAV4 on the back of his massive rig.

"Wow, this thing is quiet. Not like the rattling knockers back when I was a kid."

Silence.

Mildly freaking out over possibly spending an hour or so with nothing to do but stare out the window—I don't do well with being idle—I felt compelled to pursue a conversation.

"How many of these do you do a day?" I inquired.

"Depends," he said.

And that was that.

Giving the convo one last shot, I said to him, "Bet you could tell some stories."

He looked over at me, nodded, and said:

"You have no idea."

For the rest of the ride home—which he took what seemed to me like the longest, dog-legged route possible—I got story after horrific story. He used I-80, I-71 and finally I-480 as a heart breaking visual aid, pointing out where this happened and where that happened.


There was the story about the family of five who stopped in the right lane of the Turnpike near Exit 261 after hitting a deer, only to be plowed into by a semi seconds later, killing everyone except the youngest child, who was sitting in the middle of the front seat.

There was the older couple zigzagging through traffic in their Volvo convertible when the driver lost control and somehow flipped the car, with its open top landing on the concrete divider between the eastbound and westbound lanes.

There were stories of wrecks people walked away from without a scratch, along with stories of people dying—sometimes multiple fatalities—in accidents that didn't initially appear all that severe.

DUI accidents. "Phone accidents." Crashes in bad weather. Huge semis in ditches that took days to pull out. Motorcycle accidents. Suicides. Murders. There were a couple of stories about times that people crashed into his truck when he was working, stories of co-workers hit by motorists and killed. 

At one point, I asked him if he was desensitized to what he sees.

He said he was, to a certain degree.

But he said he still has a hard time dealing with children who are killed or severely injured.

After 26 years on the job, most of those years working 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., six days a week, he said—in not so many words—that he'd learned how to compartmentalize what he sees.

We got back to the Triple Wide around 9:00 p.m.

Chris angled his ramp so I could drive the RAV4 down it and into the back of my driveway. It still runs, although noisily. I think it's the water pump. Who knows?

After we did the paperwork, Chris gave me a Hollywood-handsome grin I didn't think he had as I shook his hand, gave him a gentle chest bump and offered a sincerely heartfelt:

"Be safe out there."

Perhaps it was cathartic for Chris to tell me as much as he did. I know police officers and firefighters enjoy—probably a bad choice of words—telling stories about their ordeals. I have to imagine his wife has heard all the stories, too—stories that, after a while, probably run together until they're all but the same.

I doubt he'll be putting the story of me and my RAV4 into his storytelling power rotation.

Thursday, August 20, 2026

2013 Mini Cooper S Coupe - Good News and Bad News

 

There's good news and bad news when it comes to MINI Coopers. The good news is, BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, which included the Mini brand. More good news: although BMW spun off most of the Rover Group in 2000, one of the things it kept was Mini. But wait, there's even more good news! BMW came out with an all-new MINI in 2001, and the car was substantially redesigned for 2007 and again for 2014, with significant updates in between. The fourth-generation MINI arrived for 2025. The bad news is, BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994.

I ran into this 2013 MINI Cooper S Coupe for sale in the town just south of The Triple Wide out here on Cleveland, Ohio's far west side. This guy always has some car or truck for sale at the end of his driveway; I guess he has a dealer's license or whatever. Anyway, I'm almost glad the asking price wasn't closer to $5,000 because I might have talked myself into at least calling the number on its FOR SALE signs.

MINI introduced the two-passenger Coupe in 2011, with sales beginning for the 2012 model year. A Roadster followed in 2012 too. By 2013, the MINI lineup had grown into quite the little family: the two-door Hardtop, four-door Countryman crossover, Clubman, Convertible, Coupe, Roadster and the new-for-2013 Paceman. That's seven different models and all of them adorable, screaming high performers. 

Of all the "modern Coopers," though, these funky things are without question the most unique. That's being kind because I like them; many people think they're flat-out strange, and I get that.

Based on the second-generation MINI Hardtop, aside from its polarizing styling, there's really no practical benefit to this being a two-passenger automobile. If anything, the styling is a deterrent to driving since the chopped rear roofline compromises rearward visibility. The Coupe was also roughly a hundred pounds heavier than the regular Hardtop. 

Being a Cooper S, this car has a 1.6-liter turbocharged, double-overhead-cam, 16-valve four-cylinder engine making 181 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque. The naturally aspirated 1.6-liter in the regular Cooper made 121 horsepower. Combine the extra scoot of the S's turbo engine with its notchy six-speed manual and go-kart-like handling, and this is a very fun car to drive. For a little while.

The stiff ride can get old. Fast. Especially as a daily driver. Non-S models have a more compliant ride, but they don't have the zoom-zoom (sorry, wrong car brand). MINI itself promoted the brand's famous "go-kart feeling," and in this case, the marketing department wasn't exactly making that up.

So, back to the bad news. Anything made by BMW has never been known as a bastion of reliability or durability. High-performing and well-engineered? Without question. The problem is, as they get older, they tend to flake out and become problematic. And those problems are pricey to fix. Very pricey.

Back in Nashville, a buddy of mine bought a used Cooper, somewhat inexplicably, too, since he was a hard-core square-body Chevy pickup guy. He ditched it after a year because every time he turned around, he was throwing a couple of grand at it.

Another guy I know had an '80s BMW 5 Series he called his "two-thousand-dollar, one-thousand-dollar car." Meaning, he paid a thousand for it, but he, too, was frequently dropping two thousand dollars on it.

There are scores of YouTube, Facebook and Instagram videos out there extolling the performance virtues of MINIs while simultaneously lamenting how fragile and expensive to repair they can be.

No doubt this one will sell, although it looks like they've already dropped the asking price by $200. I think if they really want to move it, they should drop it by at least a grand. If not two.

At five grand, I might be caught between a rock and a hard place—that being between calling on it, knowing full well I shouldn't and perhaps regretting not calling. 






There's good news and bad news when it comes to MINI Coopers. The good news is, BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, which included the Mini brand. More good news: although BMW spun off most of the Rover Group in 2000, one of the things it kept was Mini. But wait, there's even more good news! BMW came out with an all-new MINI in 2001, and the car was substantially redesigned for 2007 and again for 2014, with significant updates in between. The fourth-generation MINI arrived for 2025. The bad news is, BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994.


BMW itself says that when it sold off the Rover Group in 2000, it retained the MINI brand, along with several of the facilities that would support production of the new MINI. The first modern MINI rolled off the Oxford assembly line in April 2001.

I ran into this 2013 MINI Cooper S Coupe for sale in the town just south of The Triple Wide out here on Cleveland, Ohio's far west side. This guy always has some car or truck for sale at the end of his driveway; I guess he has a dealer's license or whatever. Anyway, I'm almost glad the asking price wasn't closer to $5,000 because I might have talked myself into at least calling the number on its FOR SALE signs.

MINI introduced the two-passenger Coupe in 2011, with sales beginning for the 2012 model year. A Roadster followed in 2012 too. By 2013, the MINI lineup had grown into quite the family: the two-door Hardtop, four-door Countryman crossover, Clubman, Convertible, Coupe, Roadster and the new-for-2013 Paceman. That's seven different models and all of them adorable, screaming high performers. 


Of all the "modern Coopers," though, these funky things are without question the most unique. That's being kind because I like them; many people think they're flat-out strange, and I get that.

Based on the second-generation MINI Hardtop, aside from its polarizing styling, there's really no practical benefit to this being a two-passenger automobile. If anything, the styling is a deterrent to driving since the chopped rear roofline compromises rearward visibility. The Coupe was also a bit heavier than the regular Hardtop, although the difference wasn't quite as dramatic as you might think.

Being a Cooper S, this car has a 1.6-liter turbocharged, double-overhead-cam, 16-valve four-cylinder engine making 181 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque. The naturally aspirated 1.6-liter in the regular Cooper made 121 horsepower. Combine the extra scoot of the S's turbo engine with its notchy six-speed manual and go-kart-like handling, and this is a very fun car to drive. For a little while.


The stiff ride can get old. Fast. Especially as a daily driver. Non-S models have a more compliant ride, but they don't have the zoom-zoom (sorry, wrong car brand). MINI itself promoted the brand's famous "go-kart feeling," and in this case, the marketing department wasn't exactly making that up.

So, back to the bad news. Anything made by BMW has never been known as a bastion of reliability or durability. High-performing and well-engineered? Without question. The problem is, as they get older, they tend to flake out and become problematic. And those problems are pricey to fix. Very pricey.

Back in Nashville, a buddy of mine bought a used Cooper, somewhat inexplicably, too, since he was a hard-core square-body Chevy pickup guy. He ditched it after a year because every time he turned around, he was throwing a couple of grand at it.

Another guy I know had an '80s BMW 5 Series he called his "two-thousand-dollar, one-thousand-dollar car." Meaning, he paid a thousand for it, but he, too, was frequently dropping two thousand dollars on it.

There are scores of YouTube, Facebook and Instagram videos out there extolling the performance virtues of MINIs while simultaneously lamenting how fragile and expensive to repair they can be.

No doubt this one will sell, although it looks like they've already dropped the asking price by $200. I think if they really want to move it, they should drop it by at least a grand. If not two.

At five grand, I might be caught between a rock and a hard place—that being between calling on it, knowing full well I shouldn't and perhaps regretting not calling. 






























Wednesday, August 19, 2026

A Four Door Camaro? They Can't be Serious, Can They?

Rumors have been swirling for months that Chevrolet was reviving the Camaro nameplate as an EV-only, four-door sedan. The latest scuttlebutt suggests that while Chevrolet does appear serious about bringing the Camaro back, it won't be EV-only. In fact, current reports point toward a rear-wheel-drive, internal-combustion Camaro, with a turbocharged four-cylinder likely serving as the base engine and a V-8 available in higher-performance versions.

There's been speculation that GM's new-generation small-block V-8 could find its way under the Camaro's hood, although exactly which engine it would be—and how much power it would make—remain unknown. I've heard nothing credible about the twin-turbo 3.0-liter V-6 currently offered in the Cadillac CT5-V being part of the Camaro lineup. The latest musings out of Detroit also suggest that an EV version isn't part of the immediate plan, despite all the earlier rumors about an electric Camaro.

The real kicker is that GM appears to be hell-bent on making the next Camaro a four-door, with no definitive indication that a traditional two-door coupe will accompany it. Right now, "they're saying" the new Camaro is expected to ride on an updated version of GM's rear-wheel-drive Alpha architecture, share its underpinnings with the next Cadillac CT5 and a forthcoming Buick sedan, and enter production at Lansing Grand River in Michigan. The latest reports put it on track for the 2029 model year.

Seems like a last-ditch effort to revive "the automobile" as we once knew it. If this thing fails, my money is it will, looks like future highways will be filled with nothing but "trucks" 

Based on these A.I.-generated renderings, Chevrolet is going back to the "retro Camaro" well yet again, something it first did with the fifth-generation Camaro introduced for 2010. That car deliberately channeled the 1967–69 first-generation Camaro, particularly the iconic 1969 model. The sixth-generation Camaro, introduced for 2016, was essentially an evolution of that design rather than a clean-sheet departure.

The styling of the fifth- and sixth-generation Camaros has always left me flat-footed, though. I find them cartoonish in ways the first four generations of the Camaro simply weren't. Maybe that's just my old-car bias talking, but there's something about those later Camaros that never quite worked for me. They're great cars—my older son has a 2017, and despite its shortcomings, it's an amazing ride—but in terms of "look back at it after parking it" appeal? Meh. Not so much.

Don't tell him I told you that. I need him to pick out a nice nursing home for me. 

The auto industry is interested in one thing above all else: making money. Automakers aren't interested in nostalgia and tradition for old-time's sake. If they can move "units" because of a retro theme or design, they're going to do it. If they can't, they won't bother.

And the best-selling vehicles in the country don't have a shred of throwback about them. The Ford F-Series, Chevrolet Silverado, Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V are about as modern and utilitarian as it gets. The Toyota Camry, America's best-selling traditional passenger car in 2025, isn't exactly dripping with nostalgia, either.

And then there's Dodge's new Charger, which supposedly oozes old-school charm. I don't get it. Whatever nostalgia Dodge was shooting for, buyers haven't exactly been beating down the doors. Dodge sold 7,421 electric Charger Daytonas in 2025. There were also 2,141 gas-powered Chargers reported for the year, although that figure included some previous-generation cars still sitting around on dealer lots. The new gasoline-powered Sixpack arrived so late that it had essentially no impact on 2025 sales; production began in December.

I'll bet you a nickel the big sixer has little impact on sales.

Alas, stylish two-door cars, which were a staple of my car-crazed youth, have been falling out of favor for decades. Once pillars of the industry, today's surviving two-doors are mostly niche products—and many are expensive ones. Chevrolet sold 24,533 Corvettes in 2025, Ford sold 45,333 Mustangs, and Dodge's new Charger Daytona managed just 7,421 electric sales in its first calendar year.

Back in the 1970s, the combined sales of the Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird and Ford Mustang could approach 900,000 in a single year. In 1979, for example, the three totaled roughly 864,000 sales. That's still an astonishing number compared with today's market, but it wasn't quite the million-plus figure my memory wanted it to be.

Frankly, the world didn't end when Ford labeled its first EV crossover "Mustang" back in 2021. Although, if I'm not mistaken, most people call it the "Mach-E" anyway. And "Mach"—a nod to the iconic Mach 1 Mustang—somehow seems less offensive than calling what's essentially a four-door crossover an actual Mustang. Ford, for its part, explicitly positioned the Mach-E as an expansion of the Mustang family and an all-electric member of the Mustang stable.

So, in the end, the world will be just fine if Chevrolet comes out with a four-door Camaro, even if it doesn't offer a two-door version. It doesn't necessarily mean Chevrolet will move a lot of Camaros if they have four doors, two doors, three doors, or if you have to jump through the sunroof to get inside them.

The market has moved so far away from sedans that it may be too far gone to come back.

The rational side of me totally gets it. The Camaro-lover in me, however, wants to jump out a window.

I mean, they can't be serious, can they? Newsflash, Camaro-boy. They can be. 
























 

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Perfect Car Casting - "Coop's Car" from "Your Friends and Neighbors" (Maserati GranTurismo)

If you're looking for a something bingeworthy, I can't say enough good things about "Your Friends and Neighbors" streaming currently on Apple TV+. Your Friends and Neighbors stars my spirit animal, Jon Hamm and it hit me with the same sledgehammer Breaking Bad did from the very first minute of the first episode, and it has yet to disappoint my wife and I as we work our way through Season 2. 

While we can't help but be drawn to the extravagant homes inhabited by the residents of fictional Westmont Village, a thinly disguised version of exceedingly affluent Westchester County just north of Manhattan, I, naturally, am drawn to the cars cast in the series. Everyone, it seems, drives the same sort of late-model, big-bucks SUV—except Jon Hamm's character, Andrew "Coop" Cooper, who drives a black-on-black Maserati GranTurismo.

Apple identifies Coop's car as a 2022 Maserati GranTurismo. Not to split the atom, but sorry, Apple, that's not a 2022 GranTurismo—not if we're talking about the car that actually appears in the show.

Based on its styling, the car is a first-generation, M145 GranTurismo. That generation was introduced at the 2007 Geneva Motor Show and remained in production through 2019. Maserati itself says the final version was a 2018 model, with production of the outgoing generation continuing into 2019 before the nameplate took a three-year hiatus.

So, while the car in the show could be from the later years of the M145 run, there's no good reason to call it a 2022. In fact, automotive film-and-TV reference site IMCDb identifies the car as an M145 and notes it as a 2008-or-newer example. From what we can see on screen, I'd be reluctant to pin down the exact model year any further.

When introduced in 2007, the Maserati GranTurismo—and its drop-head (convertible) sibling, the GranCabrio, which debuted at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show—didn't exactly reinvent the grand-touring automobile. It perfected the concept.

Here was a large, beautifully designed, naturally aspirated V-8-powered, rear-wheel-drive coupe with a long hood, short deck and room for four. It could stop traffic simply by sitting at a traffic light, then zip through it with an aplomb that no personal-luxury car of the 1970s or '80s could ever quite muster. The GranTurismo was a genuine grand tourer in the old-school sense: luxurious, fast, dramatic and capable of carrying four people in something approaching comfort.

Coop's car isn't cheap. Early in Season 1, he mentions in a voice-over that he was sitting in a "$200,000 car." That's a stretch if he's talking about the car's original sticker price—at least for most GranTurismos of this generation. A 2012 GranTurismo S, for example, carried an original MSRP of about $125,550, while the 2019 GranTurismo Sport started at roughly $150,000 and the MC was about $163,000.

It's not unlike the well-heeled to claim they overpaid for something and then brag about it. It's also not uncommon for those who appear to be well off, like Coop appears to be, living paycheck-to-paycheck like us bottom feeding poor slobs do. 

Cars like the Maserati GranTurismo aren't for everyone. With do-everything-well crossovers and sport utilities now dominating the market, the inherent impracticality of a coupe these days—even one that supposedly seats four—makes little rational sense.

Which raises the question: Why would anyone drive a car like a Maserati GranTurismo, or others in its class such as the Aston Martin Vantage, Lexus LC 500 or BMW 8 Series?

Well, it could be simply because they enjoy the car. That's why I would. I'd chafe, though, not so much at the cost of these things these days, for an exotic used car they're fairly affordable, but since they're notoriously fragile, the maintenance and repair costs which could run a buyer upwards of $10,000 to $15,000 a year. 

However, Coop doesn't come across as a "car guy." Aside from being a self-centered, egomaniacal womanizer obsessed with money, he doesn't come across as much of anything. In fairness, he might be a better parent than his ex-wife, Mel, portrayed by Amanda Peet, is. He seemingly could afford to drive almost anything, so why a Maserati GranTurismo—and one that's apparently several years old at that?

That's where car casting comes in.

Coop's Maserati helps define who his character is. He's an aging jetsetter whose best days are behind him. He's a "suburban James Bond type" who can still keep up with the Joneses to a certain degree, but it's becoming harder and harder to do so.

And that, friends and neighbors, is precisely why the Maserati is there. It isn't merely a luxury car. It's a character prop and a brilliantly cast metaphor. 

The aging GranTurismo says that Coop still wants to be "that guy" even though he's not quite what he used to be; his choices in life leaving him second guessing what made him appear to be what he never was. 

Season 3 of Your Friends and Neighbors is currently in production. 







































Sunday, August 16, 2026

Lamborghini Urus - A Pontiac Azteck and a Toyota Highlander Got Jiggy

It's rare that I come across a vehicle and don't immediately know what it is. Such was the case the other morning after my morning workout when I stumbled across this thing that looks like a Pontiac Aztek got jiggy with a Toyota Highlander. The eye-searing color got my attention; otherwise, I probably would have just walked past it, assuming it was some sort of Hyundai or Kia.

It didn't become obvious what it was until I was all but standing on top of the tailgate.

Ah-ha! I know what this is—and it ain't no Pontiac, Toyota, Hyundai or Kia.

It's a Lamborghini Urus.

A Urus?

“Urus” isn't exactly the most lyrical thing to call a vehicle with a prefix as magically Italian-sounding as “Lamborghini,” but it is fitting given Lamborghini's long-standing habit of naming its cars after powerful, fighting bulls. The urus was the aurochs, a large, powerful wild ox that once roamed Europe and is considered the ancestor of modern domestic cattle.

Naming this thing after a big ol' bull is particularly fitting given Lamborghini's use of a stylized bull in its logo. Still, it takes some mental gymnastics to wrap my arms around the fact that Lamborghini makes an SUV in the first place.

And they've been building a Urus since 2018.

However, it's not their first SUV, either. That distinction belongs to the 1986–1993 LM002. The LM002 was a purpose-built, go-anywhere off-roader with roots in a military vehicle project. It may have looked like something the Italian Army would send into battle, but underneath all that attitude was a Lamborghini V12 borrowed from the Countach.

No beauty queen, either, the LM002 makes a little more sense if you remember that Ferruccio Lamborghini started out manufacturing tractors and agricultural equipment before turning his attention to automobiles and deciding to compete with Enzo Ferrari's car-building company.

Lamborghini returned relatively late to the high-performance luxury-SUV party, but when it did, it brought piping-hot pizza and ice-cold beer and pop.

Despite looking like an angry dumpster, the Urus has always been about super-duper high performance above and beyond just about everything else.

Especially aesthetics.

Lamborghini has been part of the Volkswagen Group since 1998, through Audi, and the Urus rides on Volkswagen Group's MLB Evo platform—the same basic architecture used beneath such corporate cousins as the Audi Q7 and Q8, Bentley Bentayga, Porsche Cayenne and Volkswagen Touareg. Of course, the fact that they're platform mates doesn't mean they're identical underneath; Lamborghini has done plenty of work to make the Urus its own beast.

While I didn't wait around for the driver of this particular Urus to appear so I could ask him or her for a test drive—I wasn't even sure whether this thing had dealer plates or temporary tags—what the Urus has going for it above all of its platform mates is speed.

Lots and lots of speed.

The current Urus SE can hit a claimed 194 mph, and Lamborghini says it can go from 0 to 62 mph in 3.4 seconds. Car and Driver, meanwhile, estimates 0–60 mph in 3.4 seconds for the 2026 model, while its instrumented testing of a 2025 Urus SE produced an absolutely ridiculous 2.9 seconds.

Think about that.

Three seconds to go from standing still to 60 miles per hour.

One.

Two.

Three.

Boom.

That's fast.

And it explains why this roughly 5,600-pound "truck" has brake calipers that look like they were borrowed from a locomotive.

All that speed is gonna cost you about as much as a modest home here in the Midwest, though. The 2026 Urus SE starts at a little over $250,000 before you start piling on options, so my running into one in something as plebeian and bourgeois as a mall parking garage is not unlike running into a celebrity in the restroom at a Sheetz or Buc-ee's.

Wow! You poop too? Who'da thunk that?

The thing is, though, if you're going to spend that much money on a vehicle, wouldn't you at least want it to look like something that was obviously expensive and exotic rather than something that could, at a quick glance, blend into the fabric—or woodwork—of society?

For certain, if it weren't for this electric-mango paint job, it probably would have gone completely unnoticed.


































 

Saturday, August 15, 2026

We Say Goodbye to the Toyota Supra (Again) - And No One Cares

Back in my day, it was such a big story that Chevrolet wasn't making a Corvette for the 1983 model year that it was headline-grabbing, interrupt-the-series-finale-of-M*A*S*H-worthy. These days, Toyota discontinues its MkV GR Supra—this one for sale down in Columbus, Ohio, is a 2022—and hardly anyone notices. 

MkV, or "Mark Five", denotes the fifth generation of the Supra, GR is for Toyota's Gazoo Racing division. 

Granted, the Toyota Supra nameplate isn't nearly as famous as the Chevrolet Corvette's not to mention there was a 16-year gap in production of a "Supra". Still though, for a car as amazing as these cars were, you'd think there'd be more of a story here. 

Toyota introduced the fifth generation Supra in 2019 as a 2020 model and sold about 30,400 of them in the U.S. through June 2026. It wasn't poor sales that did it in, though. The BMW Z4, the car with which this generation of the Supra was jointly developed, also ended production. Toyota says fifth generation Supra production ended in spring 2026, while BMW ended Z4 production in March.

BMW and Toyota's collaboration dates to 2012, when the companies agreed to jointly develop architecture and components for a future sports car. Toyota chief engineer Tetsuya Tada has said he was pulled away from the Toyota 86's launch in Spain and sent to BMW's headquarters in Munich to explore whether the two companies could build a sports car together.

Toyota didn't have a lightweight, contemporary rear-wheel-drive platform and high-performance inline-six combination suited to the kind of performance Supra purists would demand. BMW did. The result was a shared architecture underneath two very different cars: the BMW Z4 roadster and Toyota Supra.

Working with BMW also allowed the two companies to share development and engineering costs, making it something of a marriage of convenience. Tada has said developing the Supra entirely on its own would have added years to the project and potentially pushed its price far beyond what Toyota considered appropriate for a Toyota sports car.

As purpose-built, high-performance sports cars go, these cars may just have been the greatest ones ever sold. Aesthetically, in my opinion, they come up way short. They're cool in a way even the sexiest crossovers today simply aren't, but this is not a beautiful car; frankly, it's almost ugly.

Where these cars really fall down is in being anything other than two-passenger performance machines that can rip your retinas from the back of your eyes. They're hard to get in and out of, uncomfortable and cramped, visibility is atrocious, and they're all but useless as overnight road-trip vehicles. Unless you're OK with recycling your clothing—or worse yet, your underwear.

Toyota first introduced the Supra in the U.S. in 1979 as the Celica Supra. It became its own model in 1986, when the third-generation A70 Supra split from the Celica. Toyota changed the sports-car landscape with its A80 Supra in 1993, but it remained a low-volume car in the U.S. and disappeared from the American market after the 1998 model year. Production continued in Japan until 2002.

The MkV's end doesn't necessarily mean the end of the Supra name. Toyota has not announced a successor, but company officials have said a next-generation Supra is a goal.