Crawling From The Wreckage
Monday, October 27, 2025
1987 Chrysler Conquest - Keep Your Mouth Shut
Sunday, October 26, 2025
1990 Chevrolet Lumina Euro 3.1 - You Can't Go Home Again
When I sold my beloved but decrepit 2002 Dale Earnhardt Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS in June of 2023, it put the literal bow tie on nearly twenty-five years of all but exclusive Chevrolet W-bodies, also known as the GM10-platform, for me. Before the Dale I had a 2001 Monte Carlo SS, a 1997 Monte Carlo LS, a 1994 Lumina Z34 and, the one that started it all in December of 1989, a brand new, and fully loaded, black, 1990 Lumina Euro 3.1 similar to this one for sale on Bringatrailer.com. No. I didn't bid on it although the thought passed through my mind.
The only difference between mine and this one, aside from the exterior color, mine had bucket seats, a console, a cassette player and power windows. I had no idea Chevrolet built Euro's like this; thought they got away from the ala carte ordering by then. Guess not. Old habits die hard. Trust me, I know all about that.
Chevrolet was two-years late to the W-body party when they rolled out the Lumina for 1990. Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick got theirs in for 1988 albeit coupes only. For 1990, Chevrolet introduced the Lumina as a coupe, four-door sedan and a funky not-so-mini minivan that resembled a Black and Decker "Dustbuster" they called "Lumina APV" (all-purpose vehicle). Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Buick got four-door versions of their Grand Prix, Cutlass and Regal, respectively, for 1990 too. Cadillac never got a W-body. Pontiac and Oldsmobile got similar looking minivans to the Lumina APV in 1990, the Trans Sport and Silhouette, as well; Buick and Cadillac never got one.
I really liked my Lumina Euro, I still don't think there's a bad line on it although it hasn't aged as well as I thought it would all those years ago. At the time I thought it would be a classic right up there with the 1957 Chevrolet. Well, guess what? I don't know everything, and I have no problem admitting that. I mean, nothing screams "1990's" and not necessarily in the best of ways like these cars do today.
My Lumina Euro was quite the step-up for me from the hoary and unreliable 1982 Buick Riviera it replaced. The Riviera broke down constantly; I didn't have a second of trouble with my Lumina Euro in more than four-years and nearly 100,000-miles. Remarkable when you think about it given the time period. It handled well though I remember the ride being very stiff if not jarring, the steering very heavy, if not unnecessarily so, especially at at low speeds. It was comfortable, roomy, good on gas and, most importantly, again, very reliable. It was, in short, everything the Riviera wasn't.
GM spent approximately $7-billion 1980's dollars on developing the W-body platform that was their answer, technically, to the Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable introduced for 1986. Oddly enough, although it didn't matter to me since I loved coupes, rather than introduce the W-bodies in 1988 with even the availability of a four-door, GM went coupe only; Ford offered the Taurus and Sable as four-door sedans and five-door wagons with no coupe options. GM offering the W's at first as only coupes, in addition to being two years late with them, were huge mistakes.
Questionable styling on the four-door sedans certainly didn't help. Even the Lumina in four-door guise are disposable, rental car designs that scream "first Bush administration"; not that the first-generation Ford Taurus or Mercury Sable look any less so but they're arguably less awful looking than the four-door W-bodies.
I traded my Euro in for a lease on a 1994 Lumina Z34 in December of 1993. Not only was it a financial faux pas, ideally you don't want to put anything down on a lease not to mention it's best not to lease at all, but I was never as happy with it as I was with the Euro. It had a fair share of gremlins the Euro never had while not being the high-performance, screaming hellion of a muscle car I thought it was going to be.
This is a relist on Bringatrailer, it had sold recently for $5,000 but the bidder reneged. I get that bidding on a car you don't test drive or actually see in person can be a tough putt, but you don't follow through on a bid and Bringatrailer will ban you.
I'm not the biggest fan of silver cars but this one works for me. It's not black or blue, which I think make this car look much better, but my biggest issue with this car is the lack of buckets, console, it doesn't even have a tape deck, and the old school crank windows are just a tad too old school for me. Just as well. It's like they say, you can't go home again. You also can't buy an old car "just like" one you had and expect to have the same feelings about it
Friday, October 17, 2025
1964 Jaguar Mark X - Begin Again
My wife Janet and I watched the 2014 Mark Ruffalo, Keira Knightly musical comedy-drama "Begin Again" on Netflix recently. She liked it but didn't love it, I found less to appreciate about it aside from its somewhat accurate insight into the music recording industry in the mid-twenty teens. I thought it so lost and pretentious that the even transcendental performances of its wonderful cast, that included a 1964 Jaguar Mark X, couldn't save it from being a fluffy, soulless, and unsatisfying musically driven version of "When Harry Met Sally".
"Begin Again" is about Dan Mulligan, played by Ruffalo, a down and out record company executive who becomes professionally smitten, although we're led to believe not personally so, with Gretta James, played by Knightly, an aspiring singer he runs into at an open-mic night while he's on a massive, and I mean massive bender. The rest of the film deals with Dan attempting to produce an album featuring Gretta and, well, guess what happens next! And, no, not that.
We never find out, though, why Dan drives, of all things, a big old Jag. It's a prominent set piece in the film, but it's never disclosed why, of all fifty-year-old cars in the world, he drives something so offbeat. Oh, I know. The Mark X is just like Dan -somewhat alluring, inherently talented but innately flawed and unreliable. Err, I don't think the producers dug that deep. I bet they found it when scouting shooting locations up in Toronto and it fit the bill for what the director of the film called for; a car for Dan that was left-of-center. If that's the case, jump well done.
If anything, the Mark X adds a dash of elan to Dan even if that mystery is happenstantial. To most people, cars are appliances to get them from point A to B, us car wonks want to believe there has to be something more than needing transportation behind why some people drive cars we construe are more than utilitarian. Most often, that's not the case. For all we know, one day Dan may trade the Mark X in for a Hyundai Sonata.
The Jaguar Mark X, or "Ten", was Jaguar's big, range-topping saloon, that's Brit-talk for sedan, from 1961 to 1970. From 1965 to 1970 it was known as the "420" to highlight a bump up of displacement from 3.8- to 4.2-liters, but it was essentially the same car.
Mark X's and 420's featured much of Jaguar's latest technology found on the E-Type sports car which was also new for 1961. Dual-overhead-cam, inline six-cylinder engine, four-wheel-disc brakes, monocoque or unibody construction, double-wishbones up front and an independent rear suspension. Pretty heady stuff for the early '60's. It's styling, though? Beg to differ all you want and from some angles, like the brochure shot above, the design sort of works. From others? Well, an E-Type or Keira Knightley it ain't.
Jaguar broke their own molds with the Mark X's "pontoon" body, much of its ethos, Jaguar would emulate on their sedan designs for much of the next half-century. Jaguar replaced the Mark X ultimately with the far comelier XJ-6\12 they debuted in 1968; the XJ and Mark X were sold side-by-side through 1970. The Mark X replaced the very long in the grill Mark IX that dated back, in large part, to 1948.
With its odd proportions and being relatively elephantine, the "X" wasn't for everyone. It was intended to be competitive in North America, but it was too expensive over here for what it was - a big, heavy, thirsty Brit with American car like build quality with a questionable design. While more affordable in England, the Mark X didn't do well there either because "petrol", as they call gas, then as now, is way more expensive than it is here.
Given what it was up against even before we consider the subjectivity of its appearance, the big car that wasn't big enough for America and was too big for England, didn't stand a chance. Jaguar sold less than 25,000 of them over ten model years.
"Begin Again" is set in New York and The Big Apple makes several and very clever cameos. Technically, "Begin Again" is tight as a drum and very well acted. It's the screenwriting where it blows its head gasket.
Thursday, October 16, 2025
2017 Toyota Camry XLE - It's Been Such a Pleasant Autumn
Hopefully our mechanic can figure out why my wife's 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GTS is overheating, I for sure cannot. If not, we're in a pickle. Not only do we loathe car shopping, but we have no idea what we'd even like to get. In an attempt to combine practicality and performance, I thought a Saturday afternoon kicking the tires on this 2017 Toyota Camry XSE would be time well spent.
Granted, Janet, my wife, wasn't thrilled with the possibility of going from her sporty, little Eclipse to what is a big grocery getter, but car guy here, my thought was she'd fall in love with the way it rode and handled and how feature rich it was for the money. Although to make $18,500 work for an eight- going on nine-year-old, 75,000-mile Camary would require some mental gymnastics for me let alone Janet.
Things went south immediately as our salesperson swung the car around for our test drive. Turned out they had mistakenly listed the car in Cars.com an X-S-E when it was an X-L-E. Big difference. The XLE is a "luxury" car, the XSE is supposedly as close to a BMW like sports sedan as a Camry could be. I let our very nice although somewhat robotic salesperson know that I wouldn't have driven the better part of an hour for a Camry XLE; not his fault of course but he wasn't the first used car salesman to glaze over when they realize they were dealing with a car nerd.
We agreed to a spin anyway but not before we noticed the car had a number of scratches on it, some fairly deep. That and it was filthy. Best was, our sales guy came with us on the test drive. So much for turning I-77 into my personal Autobahn.
The car started and ran fine; it has the same monster V-6 that's in my 2009 Toyota RAV4 so it galloped along strongly. The air blew cold, the power driver's seat had plenty of adjustment and the steering column tilted and telescoped so I could get comfy. It was packed with all the latest techno doo-dads that our Eclipse and RAV4 do not have; uou have no idea what a novelty a backup camera still is to us. The looks we get from salespeople when we get goofy over them makes us feel like we're Amish who escaped the compound.
My issue with the car, aside from its Walter Mitty meets Ziggy sheet metal, was its handling which was just shy feeling as though I was driving bathtub half full of water. That and the brakes were surprisingly not up to modern snuff. I give Toyota hall passes on just about anything I construe as "questionable", but I wondered if there was something wrong with the brakes on this car. Janet refused to drive what she referred to as something her grandparents would own.
I didn't mince words letting our sales guy sitting out back we would not be buying this car. Still, back at the dealership, he dragged us through the proverbial dog and pony show of sitting us down and discussing our "needs". When he fired up the dealership website to do a search of what we might want, I knew it was going to be twenty- to thirty-minutes before we got our butts out of there.
Then the way-too-young-to-be-the-manager-guy came over, I guess, to inquire why we wouldn't be buying this car. He explained their "forever warranty" program to us, as if I'd buy a car based solely on a warranty that I had to pay extra for. You know how that goes, you pay a small fortune up front for what was sold to you as a comprehensive warranty when in fact it's not. After you arm wrestle with the third-party warranty company over coverage, you pay a $500 deductible. That's if you're lucky that when you need the warranty, the company backing it is still in business.
We scooted out of there and hot-tailed it to our next appointment which went no better. Well, I did find that 1981 Corvette I blogged about but aside from that, that was pretty much a waste of time. Detailed blog on that experience upcoming.
I sure hope our mechanic can fix the Eclipse. It's been such a pleasant autmn so far.PS - the dealership updated the ad for the car we test drove making it an XLE.
