Showing posts with label 1971 Cadillac Eldorado convertible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1971 Cadillac Eldorado convertible. Show all posts

Thursday, November 3, 2022

1971 Cadillac Eldorado Convertible - Dreams Can Be Expensive


It's somewhat ironic I ran across this 1971 Cadillac Eldorado at the transmission shop next door to my office in perma-cloudy Youngstown, Ohio. 

My father's 1972 Cadillac Sedan deVille "dropped" its "Turbo-Hydramatic 400" transmission as did the 400 in his 1970 Buick Electra 225 he had prior to it. The transmission in my 1982 Buick Riviera blew up as well albeit that was a "Turbo 325L", a lighter duty, overdrive equipped version of the "Turbo 425" found in this big old Eldo. 


Back in the day before the earth cooled, it seemed a car needing its transmission replaced, rebuilt or repaired wasn't a matter of "if", but "when". I chuckle when I hear about how durable and bullet proof transmissions where years ago. Even the "Turbo 350" in my 1977 Corvette is not original to the car. 

The GM Turbo 425 was a part of General Motors famed Unified Power Package that made this car, the similar Oldsmobile Toronado and a gaggle of motor homes, most of them built by GMC, front-wheel-drivers. That transmission was based off GM's "Turbo 400". The legendary rear-engine Vector V-8 of 1989-1993 used it as well to pass torque to the rear wheels. 


A front-wheel-drive car is nothing out of the ordinary today but fifty years ago it most certainly was. In fact, our '71 here can trace its size-able DNA to the 1967 Eldorado that was the first front-wheel-drive Cadillac ever. 

The Unified Power Package, or "UPP", worked so well, err, when it was working, that most drivers had no idea their car was being pulled rather than pushed. 


The UPP first appeared in 1966 on the Oldsmobile Toronado. Cadillac got it starting in 1967 when they launched their new Eldorado. 

The only tell-tale was a flat floor since there was no space-robbing "hump" or tunnel running down the middle of the car for the driveshaft. That and perhaps some drivers noticed a far greater degree of foul-weather traction since nearly sixty percent of the vehicle's weight laid over the front tires. 


Surprised it wasn't more than that. Then again, there is an enormous amount of car behind the firewall as well. If my '82 Riviera did anything well, which isn't saying much, it's that it pulled like a tractor in bad weather. Especially snow. 


The "UPP" which allowed for a longitudinally mounted engine and diverted torque to the front-wheels via a transfer case of sorts, was a remarkable piece of engineering. My 2002 Monte Carlo in the background here is FWD too, but it has a "transverse mounted" engine and torque is routed directly to the front wheels. The steering wheel tugs a bit on hard acceleration, that's what they call "torque steer", but there was all but zero torque steer on cars equipped with the UPP. 

My question to GM product planners of the time would be why they didn't use the UPP on at least their mid-size cars let alone their compacts. And although expensive to manufacture and more complex than a standard front-engine, rear-wheel-drive car, why'd they only offer it on range topping personal luxury cars? Imagine a Corvair or F85 with a small V-8 and front-wheel-drive. Wow.


Imagine a fleet of gloriously roomy GM front-wheel-drive four-door sedans and wagons back then too; the packaging efficiencies of FWD (front-wheel-drive) allowing cavernous interiors relative to the size of the vehicle. No more big on the outside, tiny on the inside. Certainly, befitting the Autorama theme or aura of the 1950's and early 1960's don't you think? Those dreams that seemed to come to a grinding halt sometime in the mid to late Sixties. Dreams can be expensive. 

Legend has it the Oldsmobile Toronado was originally intended to be a front-driver based on GM's new for '64 intermediate A-body chassis that under-pinned the likes of the Oldsmobile F85, Buick Skylark, Pontiac Tempest and Chevrolet Chevelle. 


Bowing to the GM axiom of the day that the size of someone's car determined their lot in life, that plan was scuttled and the new for '66 full size Toronado and '67 Eldorado were literally christened. 

GM used the UPP through 1985, 1979's E-body reboot that also included the Buick Riviera used, again, a lighter duty version of it they dubbed the "THM (Turbo-Hyrdamatic) 325". Overdrive versions like my Riviera had where called "325L's". I'll never forget the sickening feeling I had when I noticed that car taking for ever to upshift out of first gear. Swapping out that clunker cost me $1,800. In 1989. Ouch. 

For 1971, GM rebooted the Toronado and Eldorado making the Toronado, which I thought ghastly looking through 1970, especially the 1966 and 1967 versions, look much like the 1967-1970 Eldorado. Meanwhile the Eldorado, which had been, remarkably, touted as luxury-sports-grand tourer, became a fluffy parade float. 


Another "who-cares" was that these cars had 8.2 LITRE, or 500-cubic inch V-8 engines which was, and, kids, this will be on the test, the largest V-8 engine ever offered in a passenger car. Although, frankly, it didn't offer significantly greater performance than somewhat smaller displacement engines offered by Oldsmobile, Buick and Pontiac. Chevrolet too. Cadillac offered the "500" across their entire line starting in 1975. Well, save for the Seville starting in 1975. 


I've had little to do with these cars for as long as I can remember although it might be fun to turn this into a sleeper. Saving grace on this car, on the '72's as well, in my opine is this luscious, whimsical fake cooling vent intake design thing hearkening the original Eldorado of 1953-1956. 


1973's don't have it making their flanks slab sided and lifeless. Again, my blog, my rules. There was minor updating for 1974. Same for the 1975 into 1976 and they have their fans. Especially the convertibles. 1976 was the last year for the factory-built drop-tops. 


Next time I'm out at the office, if I happen upon one of the owners of the shop I'll ask about this car. It's a family-owned business and they're wonderful people. I have no doubt they'll tell me the THM425 is shot, and the owner has given up on it. 

Quick check on NADA values pegs this car worth around $10,000 but that's got to be a fully functioning car.  A new THM425 will set someone back a cool three-grand. 




Thursday, June 17, 2021

1971 Cadillac Eldorado - Nice To Think About


Another day as we say and another Facebook Marketplace gem. This time by way of relatively nearby Toledo, Ohio we have this 1971 Cadillac Eldorado convertible and I can't tell you how much I want to call on it to at least kick the tires in person and take it for a spin. While I'm at it ride on that swing set and hobby horse too. Of course I won't as the idea of doing so is most always more fun than actually doing it. I'm not into wasting anyone's time either. Still, fun to think about it. If it were a tad closer I might think more seriously about it but I have better things to do than drive three-hours round trip to joy-ride some old hoopty I have no real intention of buying. 


One of the most compelling things about this car is it has an asking price of a scant $6,500 and the only thing the seller claims it needs is a paint job. Well, to do it right that would not be cheap not but if that is all this needs, with a three to four thousand dollar paint job, all in for around ten-grand this might not be a bad investment. Challenge of course would be recouping expenses; in particular if I bought this with the intent to flip it at a profit. These cars in fair condition are valued by Haggerty at some $12,500 but nine times out of ten I've found those values to be generous. Makes you wonder why this one would go for so little. Then again, that hour and half or so traipse west might just answer that question for me. 


The first Cadillac Eldorado was introduced in 1953 as part of Cadillac's fiftieth anniversary celebration. Named by a Cadillac employee, through 1955 all Eldorado's where convertibles; a hard top model was added in 1956. The Eldorado was built on Cadillac's C-body chassis through 1966 and was switched to General Motor's E-body for 1967 sharing it with the Oldsmobile Toronado and Buick Rivera. Whereas Buick chose to keep the running gear of the Riviera "conventional", meaning front-engine, rear wheel drive, Cadillac chose to adopt the front-wheel-drive, "Unitized Power Package" that Oldsmobile used on the Toronado; only difference being Cadillac used their proprietary V-8 engine and not the Oldsmobile engine. There was no convertible Eldorado for 1967; the first time there was none since the model was introduced in 1953. 


That lack of a convertible Eldorado changed with the literal "big-reboot" for 1971. Cadillac overhauled their entire lineup for 1971 and along with a new deVille and Fleetwood line, Eldorado was changed significantly as well. Although less than an inch longer overall, the new Eldorado rode on a wheel base more than six-inches longer; no doubt the bump in wheelbase was to enable the optional convertible top to fold down on top of the rear deck of the car and not take up much if any space in the trunk. The Eldorado was the only convertible offered in the Cadillac line starting in 1971.  


In my opinion, these Eldorado's are one of the few automobiles that actually looks best in convertible form. Fixed room versions are pillared and the look, again, through my goggles, is awkward, clumsy and extremely bulky; I like a big car but even I have my limits. These are not svelte automobiles and along with the bulging rear fenders, a lovely if pointless throw-back styling detail that went into the dumpster on the 1973's, made the cars look even larger. The convertible top helps to trip the over all bulk of the design and add at least some sort of sporting elan to the whole thing. 


While the previous models were hardly "sporty" in terms of their road manners, Cadillac softened the suspension settings on these cars for an even more cloud-like ride. Riding like a cloud does a car no favors when the going gets choppy or twisty but Cadillac determined that kind of super cushy, floaty ride was what their target buyers wanted. They probably weren't wrong with that assessment seeing that folks with money back then grew up with cars that rode like farm implements with hard rubber tires or steel wheels. Couple that with primitive roads, and cars like this Eldorado riding on smooth pavement must have been dreams come true. 


These cars shared most of the same dashboard layout other also-new for '71 Cadillac's did; sadly, a wretched affair of hard, life-less injection molded plastic and hard plastic. The leather trimmed interior it shared with other Cadillac's was also inferior to the plusher high quality vinyl found in Buick's and Oldsmobile's. So, what did buyers get with this car that made it worth the substantial tariff to own one? If they weren't into the subtle brilliance of the torque-steer squashing front-wheel-drive hookup and the styling, not much more than perceived prestige and "pride-of-ownership" as you showed off you could afford it. 


That sort of thing doesn't row my boat but it sure did for people of my parents generation, what Tom Brokaw refers to as, "The Greatest Generation". My mother in particular was steadfast convinced to the day she died that there was something truly special about a Cadillac. That may have been true at one time but by the 1970's that sentiment, clearly, was not grounded in reality. 


Still, I'll take this car simply because I like it. Of course I won't but it is nice to think about.